Ultrasonic evaluation of milk duct dilatation in mastalgia in Erbil, Iraq
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2013.0013Keywords:
Mastalgia, duct ectasia, ultrasound, ErbilAbstract
Background and objective: As the etiology of mastalgia is poorly understood this study applied ultrasonography to mastalgia patients with the aim of analyzing the significance of milk duct dilatation in patients with mastalgia. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 170 women with the mean age of 31 years presenting with breast pain who were referred to the Radiology Department of the Maternity and Rizgari Teaching Hospitals from October 2008 to September 2009. The breasts of each woman were examined by ultrasound scan with special attention was focused on the milk ducts. The presence and the width of the ducts were documented. Each woman was asked for pain intensity and breast pain intensity evaluated as mild, moderate and severe. Results: The mean±SD diameter of duct was 3.99±1.37 mm. The mean diameter of the duct was higher among the younger age group of <25 years than older age groups (4.28 vs 3.95 and 3.87), among married than singles (3.99 vs 3.90) and among those having cyclic pain compared to those having non-cyclic pain (4.0 vs 3.95). However, these differences were not statistically significant. The mean diameter of the duct was significantly higher among those having bilateral pain than those having unilateral pain (4.47 for bilateral vs 4.02 for left side and 3.61 for right side) and among those having severe pain compared to those having moderate or mild pain (4.91 vs 3.40 and 3.28). Conclusion: The study results show that duct ectasia is a major factor in determining the severity of mastalgia with no significance difference between cyclical and non-cyclical mastalgia.Metrics
References
Lamarque JL. The commonest complaints in the radiology clinic. In: An Atlas of the Breast: Clinical Radiodiagnosis. London, England: Wolfe Medical Publi.; 1984. P210.
BRIDGE Study Group. The presentation and management of breast symptoms in general practice in South Wales. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:811-812.
Mansel RE. ABC of breast disease: breast pain. BMJ. 1994;309:866-868.
Roberts MM, Elton RA, Robinson SE, French K. Consultations for breast disease in general practice and hospital referral patterns. Br J Surg 1987;74:1020-1022.
Marrow M. The evaluation of common breast problems. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:2371-8.
Preece PE, Mansel RE, Bolten PM, Hughes LE, Baum M, Gravelle IH. Clinical syndromes of mastalgia. Lancet 1976;2:670-3.
Davies EL, Gateley CA, Miers M, Mansel RE. The long-term course of mastalgia. J R Soc Med. 1998;91:462-464.
Hanif AM, Rasool S. Presentation, management and out come of mastalgia. J Surg Pak
;10:15-7.
Watt-Boolsen S, Emus H, Junge J. Fibrocystic disease and mastalgia. Dan Med Bull 1982;29:252-4.
Jorgensen J, Watt-Boolsen S. Cyclical mastalgia and breast pathology. Acta Chir Scand 1985;151:319-21.
BeLieu RM. Mastodynia. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1994; 21:461-477.
Klimberg VS. Etiology and management of breast pain. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Hellman S, eds. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:99-106.
Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA. Evaluation and management of breast pain. Mayo Clin Proc 004;79(3):353-72.
Peters F, Diemer P, Mecks O, Behnken LJ. Se verity of mastalgia in relation to milk duct dilatation. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 101(1): 56-60.
Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA. Evaluation and management of breast pain. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79:353-72.
Carmichael AR. Can Vitex Agnus Castus be used for the treatment of mastalgia? What is the current evidence? Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2008; 5(3):247–50.
Snowden HM, Renfrew MJ, Woolridge MW. Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (2):CD000046.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Havin A. Akreyi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in Zanco J Med Sci is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).