Advance Search

Outcome of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation in Keratoconus: 5 Years Follow up

Ahmed Kareem Joma
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:

Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmed Kareem Joma (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Share:
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Background and objective: Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive non inflammatory bilateral (usually asymmetric) ectatic corneal disease characterized by paraxial stromal thinning, weakening that lead to corneal surface distortion, vision loss primarily from irregular astigmatism and myopia and secondly from corneal scar. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of implantation of Intrastromal Corneal Ring ( ICRS) in the cornea, the improvement of visual acuity and long-term mechanical stability results of keratometers values in KC after 5 years follow up of those cases.

Methods: In this study ICRS segments were used for the management of KC, the study continued for ten years and each case completed 5 years of follow up, the study started in January 2010 and ended in October 2019, the patients were collected from Erbil Teaching Hospital or from the researcher’s private clinic. One or two ICRS were implanted in the keratoconus corneal area. Statistical analysis included preoperative and postoperative keratometry (K) values, and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).

Results: Forty-six eyes of 37 patients were involved in this study, topographical corneal changes showed by the decrease in the mean of K1, medians of K2 and the mean of K1 &K2 especially in the first postoperative month and remain stable in most of the cases throughout the 5 years period, this was statistically significant by (P <0.001) value. The medians of UCVA increases in the first 3 years and at some time slightly decreases and remain stable throughout the 5 years of follow up but better than before the operations, and this results is also statistically significant by (P <0.001), the medians of CDVA improved from preoperative to postoperative period during the 5years follow up and remain stable, it was statistically significant (P <0.001), and this is emphasized by the number of the eyes had VA gain. 

Conclusion: There was a significant improvement in the visual acuity and keratometric readings of cases with advanced keratoconus and high astigmatism after implantation of ICRS in which the VA did not improved by glasses or contact lenses, subsequently there was improvement of the topographic state of the cornea and quality of vision for long time and this delays the need for corneal grafting surgery. Good selection of patients and implanting the proper ICRS by an expert surgeon will minimize the complication to nearly none. 

PDF
PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Amanzadeh K, Elham R, Jafarzadepur E. Effects of single-segment Intacs implantation on visual acuity and corneal topographic indices of keratoconus. Journal of Current Ophthalmology. 2017; 29(3):189-93. PMID: 28913509. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.joco
  2. Avni-Zauberman N, Rootman DS. Cross-Linking and Intracorneal Ring Segments—Review of the Literature. Eye & Contact Lens. 2015; 41(4):254. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000091.
  3. Rapuano CJ, Timothy S, Colin J, Fedar RS, Chair G. Prepared by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Cornea/ External Disease Panel Cornea/External Disease Panel Members (2024-2025). https://www.aao.org.
  4. Snibson GR. Collagen cross-linking: a new treatment paradigm in corneal disease–a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010; 38(2):141-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02228.x
  5. Piñero DP, Alio JL. Intracorneal ring segments in ectatic corneal disease–a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010; 38(2):154-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14539
  6. Barnett M, Mannis MJ. Contact lenses in the management of keratoconus. Cornea. 2011; 30(12):1510-6.https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318211401f. PMID: 26104589 Review
  7. Vega-Estrada, Alfredo MD, Alió JL, Plaza-P. Keratoconus progression after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in young patients: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 1;41(6):1145-52. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.08.045.
  8. Bromley JG, Randleman JB. Treatment strategies for corneal ectasia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010 ; 1;21(4):255-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32833a8bfe (2010).PMID:20489623.
  9. Sakellaris D, Balidis M, Gorou O, Szentmary N, Alexoudis A, Grieshaber MC,etal. Intracorneal ring segment implantation in the management of keratoconus: an evidence-based approach. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019; 8:5–14 [Internet]. https://doi:10.1007/s40123-019-0162-1.
  10. Albertazzi R, Rocha-de-L., Zaldivar R. A new technique to implant intracorneal ring-segments from the perilimbal region: one-year prospective pilot study report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; J 16; 24(1):288. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03552-0.
  11. Torquetti L, Berbel RF, Ferrara P. Long-term follow-up of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(10):1768-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.036.
  12. Colin J, Velou S. Implantation of Intacs and a refractive intraocular lens to correctkeratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29(4):832-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01618-8.j.jcrs. PMID: 12686257.
  13. Asbell PA, Uçakhan ÖÖ. Long-term follow-up of Intacs from a single center. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27(9):1456-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00980-4.j.jcrs.
  14. Colin J, Cochener B, Savary G, Malet F. Correcting keratoconus with intracornealrings. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26(8):1117-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00451-x.
  15. Siganos D, Ferrara P, Chatzinikolas K, Bessis N, Papastergiou G. Ferrara intrastromalcorneal rings for the correction of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28(11):1947-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01495-5.j.jcrs.
  16. Colin J, Cochener B, Savary G, Malet F, Holmes-Higgin D. INTACS inserts for treating keratoconus: one-year results. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(8):1409-14. https://doi.org/10.10161-6420(01)00646-7.
  17. Siganos CS, Kymionis GD, Kartakis N, Theodorakis MA, Astyrakakis N, Pallikaris IG. Management of keratoconus with Intacs. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135(1):64-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01824-x.
  18. Assil KK, Barrett AM, Fouraker BD, Schanzlin DJ. One-year results of the intrastromal corneal ring in nonfunctional human eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113(2):159-67. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100020041026.
  19. Siganos CS, Kymionis GD, Astyrakakis N, Pallikaris IG. Management of corneal ectasia after laser In situ keratomileusis with INTACS. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18:43-46. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20020901-06.
  20. Dias S. FB, Franca Al. EA. Ferrara P. Utililizacao do Anel de Ferrara naestabilizacao e correcaoda ectasia corneana pos PRK. (Use of Ferrara s ring in the stabilization and correction of corneal ectasia after PRK). Arq Bras Oftalmologia. 2000; 63:2218.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492000000300008.
  21. Ruckhofer J, Stoober J, Twa MD, Grabner G. Correction of astigmatism with short arc-length intrastromal corneal ring segments; preliminary results. Ophthalmology 2003; 110:516-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01773-6.
  22. Nose W, Neves RA, Burris TE, Schanzlin DJ, Belfort R Jr. Intrastromal corneal ring: 12-months sighted myopiceyes. J Refract Surg. 1996; 12:20-28. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-19960101-08.
  23. Schanzlin DJ, Asbell PA, Burris TE, Durrie DS. The intrastromal ring segments; Phase II results for the correction of myopia. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1067-1078.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30183-3.
  24. Holmes-Higgin DK, Burris TE,Lapidus JA, Greenlick MR. Risk factors for self-reported visual symptoms with Intacs inserts for myopia. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/so161-6420(01)00858-2.
  25. Asbell PA, Ucakhan OO, Abbott RL, Assil KA, Burris TE,Durrie DS, et al. Intrastromal corneal ring segments: reversibility of refractive effect. J Refract Surg. 2001; 17:25-31. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20010101-03.
  26. Daxer A, Mahmoud H, Venkateswaran RS. Intracorneal continuous ring implantation for keratoconus: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36(8):1296-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.039.
  27. Kymionis GD, Bouzoukis DI, Portaliou DM, Pallikaris IG. New INTACS SK implantation in patients with post–laser in situ keratomileusis corneal ectasia. Cornea. 2010; 29(2):214-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a26b72 (2010).
  28. Alió JL, Shabayek MH, Artola A. Intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus correction: long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32(6):978-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.044.
  29. Anders P, Anders LM, Elalfy M, Hamada S, Seitz B, Gatzioufas Z. Effect of intracorneal ring segment implantation on high order aberrations comparing patients with eccentric versus central keratoconus. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022; 32(1):36-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721211041022.
  30. Kang MJ, Byun YS, Yoo YS, Whang WJ, Joo CK. Long-term outcome of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus: Five-year follow up. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1):315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-3666807.
  31. Warrak EL, Serhan HA, Ayash JG, Wahab CH, Baban TA, Daoud RC, etalh. Long-term follow up of intracorneal ring segment implantation in 932 keratoconuseyes. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020; 43(10):1020-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2020.03.019.
How to Cite
Kareem Joma, A. (2025). Outcome of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation in Keratoconus: 5 Years Follow up. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences (Zanco J Med Sci), 29(3), 745–752. https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2025.078

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel