Forensic investigation of Barzanian mass grave skeletal remains at Busaya desert in Samawa, Iraq
Background and objective: Human identification and anthropological evaluation of mass graves are the key step towards scientific documentation and achieving justice. This study aimed to investigate the exhumation, anthropological evaluation, and individual victim identification of a mass grave in Busaya in Samawa governorate.
Methods: The investigation included excavation of the graves and identification of the victims. The field study was started after taking testimonies and witnesses for locating the site of graves. The sites were determined, which were excavated according to the scientific standard procedures. Gender determination and age and stature estimation were performed on the remnant skeletons in the laboratory of the medico-legal institute in Erbil.
Results: The grave included 93 bodies, 66 (71%) were males, 24 (26%) were possibly males, while the others were not identified because of degradations of the bones. The results of age estimation reported that the number of young bodies under 20 years old were five cases (5.4%), while 53 cases (57%) were young bodies between 20-29 years. The rest were more than 30 years old, except for eight cases that could not be identified. The results of stature revealed that more than half of cases had stature more than 166 cm, while only six cases were less than 155 cm. All the remained bones were recorded in detail for more documentation.
Conclusion: These findings described the anthropological evaluation of a large Barzanian mass graves in Busaya desert in the south region in Iraq. The majority (or all) of the victims were males and young people.
Groen W, Márquez-Grant N, Janaway R. Forensic archaeology: a global perspective. London: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
Juhl K. The contribution by (forensic) archaeologists to human rights investigations of mass graves: Museum of archaeology, Norway, Stavanger; 2005.
Stover E, Haglund WD, Samuels M. Exhumation of mass graves in Iraq: considerations for forensic investigations, humanitarian needs, and the demands of justice. JAMA 2003; 290(5): 663–6.
State UDo. Iraq human rights report. In. USA: US State Government; 2015.
Congram D, Sterenberg J. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. California: Left coast Press; 2009. P. 441–53.
Black G. Genocide in Iraq: The Anfal campaign against the Kurds: Human Rights Watch; 1993.
Schmitt S. Mass Graves and the Collection of Forensic Evidence: Genocide, War. Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, theory, and archaeological perspectives. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press; 2002. P. 277–92.
McKinley JI. Compiling a skeletal inventory: cremated human bone. Updated Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains. UK, Chartered Institute for Archeologists; 2004. P. 54–7.
Cox M. Ageing adults from the skeleton. Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000. P. 61–82.
Mays S. Sex determination in skeletal remains. Human Osteology in Archeology and Forensic Science. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000. P. 117–30.
De Mendonca M. Estimation of height from the length of long bones in a Portuguese adult population. Am J Phys Anthropol 2000; 112(1): 39–48.
Byman DL. Divided they stand lessons about partition from Iraq and Lebanon. Security Studies 1997; 7(1):1–29.
Komar DA, Buikstra JE. Forensic anthropology: contemporary theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in Zanco J Med Sci is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).