Normal anatomic variants of paranasal sinus region studied by computed tomography

  • Shawnam Nasih Dawood Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
Keywords: Anatomic variants, Paranasal sinuses, Computed tomography


Background and objective: Variation in paranasal sinus anatomy, as shown on computed tomographic scans, is of potential significance as it may pose risks during surgery or predispose to certain pathologic conditions. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of anatomic variants of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses in our population and determine their relationship with gender and find out the association of these variants with mucosal abnormalities.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University from October 2017 to January 2019. A review of computed tomography scans of the paranasal sinuses of 300 patients was done; special attention was directed toward identifying bony anatomic variants and mucosal abnormalities.

Results: Frequent variants were: Agger nasi cells (72%), nasal septal deviation (71.7%), Haller cells (70.7%), concha bullosa (61%), elongation of uncinate process (69.7%) and different variants of the sphenoidal sinus (78.8%). The frequency of variants did not differ significantly with respect to gender, except for sphenoidal variants along with Keros types and asymmetry of the ethmoidal roof. A significant association was found between middle concha variants and inferior turbinate enlargement (P <0.001).

Conclusion: Anatomic variants of the paranasal sinus region were common in our population; the most frequent ones were those involving the nasal septum, ethmoid air cells, sphenoid sinuses, and middle turbinates. The study of these variants is important for the management of paranasal sinus region disease.


Roman RA, Hedeşiu M, Gersak M, Fidan F, Băciuţ G, Băciuţ M. Assessing the prevalence of paranasal sinuses anatomical variants in patients with sinusitis using Cone Beam Computer Tomography. Clujul Med 2016; 89(3):419–21.

Khojastepour L, Mirhadi S, Mesbahi SA. Anatomical Variations of Ostiomeatal Complex in CBCT of Patients Seeking Rhinoplasty. J Dent (Shiraz) 2015; 16(1):42–8.

Azila A, Irfan M, Rohaizan Y, Shamim AK. The prevalence of anatomical variations in osteomeatal unit in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Med J Malaysia 2011; 66:191–4.

Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM. The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. AJNR 2004; 25:1613–8.

Fadda GL, Rosso S, Aversa S, Petrelli A, Ondolo C, Succo G. Multiparametric statistical correlations between paranasal sinus anatomic variations and chronic rhinosinusitis. Acta OtorhinolaryngolItal 2012; 32:244–51.

Kaya M, Çankal F, Gumusok M, Apaydin N, Tekdemir I. Role of anatomic variations of paranasal sinuses on the prevalence of sinusitis: Computed tomography findings of 350 patients. Niger J Clin Pract 2017; 20:1481–8.

Mathew R, Omami G, Hand A, Fellows D, Lurie A. Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42:20130055

Nouraei SA, Elisay AR, Dimarco A, Abdi R, Majidi H, Madani SA, et al. Variations in paranasal sinus anatomy: implications for the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis and safety of endoscopic sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 38(1):32–7.

Tomovic S, Esmaeili A, Chan NJ, Choudhry OJ, Shukla PA, Liu JK, et al. High-resolution computed tomography analysis of the prevalence of Onodi cells. Laryngoscope 2012; 122(7):1470–3.

Alkire BC, Bhattacharyya N. An assessment of sinonasal anatomic variants potentially associated with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2010; 120:631–4.

İla K, Yilmaz N, Öner S, Başaran E, Öner Z. Evaluation of superior concha bullosa by computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 2018; 40:841–6.

Kanowitz SJ, Nusbaum AO, Jacobs JB, Lebowitz RA. Superior turbinate pneumatization in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: prevalence on paranasal sinus CT. Ear Nose Throat J 2008; 87:578–9.

Som PM, Park EE, Naidch TP, Lawson W. Crista galli pneumatization is an extension of the adjacent frontal sinus. Am Soc Neuroradiol 2009; 30:31–3.

Comer BT, Kincaid NW, Smith NJ,Wallace JH, Kountakis SK.Frontal sinus septations predict the presence of supraorbital ethmoid cells. Laryngoscope 2013; 123:2090–3.

Smith KD, Edwards PC, Saini TS, Norton NS. The prevalence of concha bullosa and nasal septal deviation and their relationship to maxillary sinusitis by volumetric tomography. Int J Dent 2010; 2010:9–13.

Kim HJ, Jung CM, Lee JW, Tae KY, Kahng H, Sung KH, et al. The relationship between anatomic variations of paranasal sinuses and chronic sinusitis in children. Acta Otolaryngol 2006; 126:1067–72.

Mikami T, Minamida Y, Koyanagi I, Baba T, Houkin K. Anatomical variations in pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process. J Neurosurg 2007; 106:170–4.

Hamid O, El Fiky L, Hassan O, Kotb A, El Fiky S. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on trans-sphenoid pituitary surgery. Skull Base 2008; 18:9–15.

Hewaidi G, Omami G. Anatomic variation of sphenoid sinus and related structures in Libyan population: CT scan study. Libyan J Med 2008; 3(3):128–33.

Kitaguchi Y, Takahashi Y, Mupas-Uy J, Kakizaki H. Characteristics of Dehiscence of Lamina Papyracea Found on Computed Tomography Before Orbital and Endoscopic Endonasal Surgeries. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27(7):662–5.

Badia L, Lund VJ, Wei W, Ho WK. Ethnic variation in sinonasal anatomy on CT-scanning. Rhinology 2005; 43:210–4.

Gupta P, Ramesh P. Radiological observation of ethmoid roof on basis of keros classification and its application in endonasal surgery. Int J Anat Res 2017; 5:4204–7.

Reddy UD, Dev B. Pictorial essay: Anatomical variations of paranasal sinuses on multidetector computed tomography-How does it help FESS surgeons? Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012; 22(4):317–24.

Kubota K, Takeno S, Hirakawa K. Frontal recess anatomy in Japanese subjects and its effect on the development of frontal sinusitis: computed tomography analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 44(1):21.

Choby G, Thamboo A, Won TB, Kim J, Shih LC, Hwang PH. CT analysis of frontal cell prevalence according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018; 8:825–30.

Han D, Zhang L, Ge W, Tao J, Xian J, Zhou B. Multiplanar computed tomographic analysis of the frontal recess region in Chinese subjects without frontal sinus disease symptoms. ORL J Otorhinolryngol Relat Spec 2008; 70:104–12

Vaid S, Vaid N. Normal Anatomy and Anatomic Variants of the Paranasal Sinuses on Computed Tomography. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2015; 25(4):527–48.

Bradley DT, Kountakis SE. The role of agger nasi air cells in patients requiring revision endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131:525–7.

Kayalioglu G, Oyar O, Govsa F. Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus bony variations: a computed tomographic study. Rhinology 2000; 38:108–13.

Sharma BN, Pant OB, Lohani B. Computed tomography in the evaluation of pathological lesions of paranasal sinuses. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2015; 13(30):116–20.

Reddy A, Kakumanu PK, Kondragunta C, Gandra NR. Role of computed tomography in identifying anatomical variations in chronic sinusitis: An observational study. West Afr J Radiol 2018; 25:65–71.

Alsowey AM, Abdulmonaem G, Elsammak A, Fouad Y. Diagnostic Performance of Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) in Diagnosis of Sinus Variations. Pol J Radiol 2017; 82:713–25.

Adeel M, Shaheryar M, Rajput M, Akhter S, Ikram M, Arain A, et al. Anatomical variations of nose and para-nasal sinuses; CT scan review. JPMA 2013; 63:47–52.

Riello APFL, Boasquevisque EM. Anatomical variants of the ostiomeatal complex: tomographic findings in 200 patients. Radiol Bras 2008; 41(3):149–54.

Dafalla S Seyed M, Elfadil N Elmustafa O, Hussain Z. A Computed Tomography-Aided Clinical Report on Anatomical Variations of the Paranasal Sinuses. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2017; 6(2):24–33.

Kalaiarasi R, Ramakrishnan V, Poyyamoli S. Anatomical Variations of the Middle Turbinate Concha Bullosa and its Relationship with Chronic Sinusitis: A Prospective Radiologic Study. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 22(3):297–302.

Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM. The Incidence of Concha Bullosa and Its Relationship to Nasal Septal Deviation and Paranasal Sinus Disease. Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25(9):1613–8.

Yadav R, Ansari M, Humagain M, Mishra D. Assessment Of Anatomical Variations Of Nose And Paranasal Sinuses In Multidetector Computed Tomography. JIOM 2017; 39(1):49–54.

Gupta AK, Gupta B, Gupta N, Tripathi N. Computed Tomography of Paranasal Sinuses: A Roadmap to Endoscopic Surgery. Clin RhinolInt J 2012; 5(1):1–10.

Gibelli D, Cellina M, Gibelli S, Oliva AG, Termine G, Sforza C. Anatomical variants of sphenoid sinuses pneumatisation: A CT scan study on a Northern Italian population. Radiol Med 2017; 122:575–80.

Farmer SEJ, Eccles R. Chronic inferior turbinate enlargement and the implications for surgical intervention. Rhinology 2006; 44:234–8.

How to Cite
Dawood, S. (2020). Normal anatomic variants of paranasal sinus region studied by computed tomography. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences (Zanco J Med Sci), 24(2), 187-196.
Original Articles