Impact of genetic variations on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of medicines and the future of drug therapy

Authors

  • Rojgar Hamed Ali Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2020.009

Keywords:

Pharmacogenetic, Enzyme inhibitors, Individualized medicine, Mutation, Metabolizing enzymes

Abstract

Genetic variations between individuals usually leads to differences in the drug response as it could affect both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. An example of mutation of genes that affect drug targets (pharmacodynamic) is VKORC1 gene that codes for active sites of the enzyme vitamin K epoxide reductase that is responsible for activation vitamin K. A famous example of mutation affecting pharmacodynamic properties of medicine is the anticancer agent irinotecan. Bone marrow suppression is a well known side effect for this medicine. In many cases, this adverse drug reaction appears to be very severe compared to the majority of the individuals, and that is possibly due to a mutation of a gene called UDP-GT 1A1.Identifying exact genes could be helpful in better targeting of medicines in the future, Pharmacogenetic testing and individualized medicine widens the window of therapy for better treatment approaches, it helps us to reduce both rate of toxicity and the dose of the drug, so it saves both lives and economically efficient that is why it worth funding by drug authorities in order for improving better and economically efficient clinical practice in the future.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kalow W. Familial incidence of low pseudocholinesterase level. Lancet 1956; ii:576–7.

Louca S. Personalized medicine-a tailored health care system, challenges and opportunities. Croat Med J 2012; 53:211–3.

Evans WE, Relling MV. Pharmacogenomics: translating functional genomics into rational therapies. Science 1999; 286(5439):487–91.

Weng L, Zhang L, Peng Y, Huang RS. Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: a bridge to individualized cancer therapy. Pharmacogenomics 2013; 14(3):315–24.

Lalovic B, Kharasch E, Hoffer C. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral oxycodone in healthy human subjects: role of circulating active metabolites. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006; 79(5):461–79.

Owen A, Chandler B, Back DJ. The implications of P-glycoprotein in HIV: friend or foe? Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2000; 19:283.

Kato M, Serretti A. Review and meta-analysis of antidepressant pharmacogenetic findings in major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2010; 15(5):473–50.

Rost S, Fregin A, Ivaskevicius V, Conzelmann E, Hortnagel K, Pelz HJ, et al. Mutations in VKORC1 cause warfarin resistance and multiple coagulation factor deficiency type 2. Nature 2004; 427:537–41.

Rettie AE, Tai G. The pharmocogenomics of warfarin: closing in on personalized medicine. MolInterv 2006; 6:223–7.

Barabash A, Marcos A, Ancin I, Vazquez-Alvarez B, de Ugarte C. APOE, ACT and CHRNA7 genes in the conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2009; 30:1254–64.

Weng P, Chen J, Chen T, Sun Y, Wen L, Yip P. CHRNA7 Polymorphisms and Response to Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One 2013; 8(12):e84059.

Danielson PB. The cytochrome P450 superfamily: biochemistry, evolution and drug metabolism in humans. Current Drug Metabolism 2002; 3(6):561–97.

Allocati N, Masulli M, Di Ilio C, Federici L. Glutathione transferases: substrates, inihibitors and pro-drugs in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Oncogenesis 2018; 7(1):8.

Marsh S, Hoskins J. Irinotecan pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics 2010; 11(7):1003–10.

Takano M, Sugiyama T. UGT1A1 polymorphisms in cancer: impact on irinotecan treatment. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine 2017; 10:61–8.

Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 2012; 23(10):2479–16.

Bressolle F, Rochette A, Khier S, Dadure C, Ouaki J, Capdevila X. Population pharmacokinetics of the two enantiomers of tramadol and O-demethyl tramadol after surgery in children. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102:390–9.

Zhou SF. Polymorphism of human cytochrome P450 2D6 and its clinical significance: Part II. Clin Pharmacokinet 2007; 48:761–804.

Stamer UM, MusshoffF, Kobilay M, Madea B, Hoeft A. Concentrations of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol enantiomers in different CYP2D6 genotypes. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007; 82:41–7.

Wang SQ, Li CS, Song YG. Multiply organ dysfunction syndrome due to tramadol intoxication alone. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27:903.

Evans DA, Manley KA, Mckusick VA. Genetic control of isoniazid metabolism in man. Br Med J 1960; 2(5197):485–91.

Djalalov S, Musa Z, Mendelson M, Siminovitch K, Hoch J. A review of economic evaluations of genetic testing services and interventions (2004–2009). Genet Med 2011; 3(2):89–94.

Plumpton CO, Roberts D, Pirmohamed M, Hughes DA. A systematic review of economic evaluations of pharmacogenetictesting for prevention of adverse drug reactions. Pharmacoeconomics 2016; 34(8):771–93.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Ali, R. H. (2020). Impact of genetic variations on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of medicines and the future of drug therapy. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences (Zanco J Med Sci), 24(1), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2020.009

Issue

Section

Original Articles