Accuracy of Modified Alvarado Scoring System in Early Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Tayeb S. Kareem; Nadya Y. Ahmed; Star S. Hussein

doi:10.15218/zjms.2009.013

Authors

Tayeb S. Kareem Assistant Professor of surgery, Consultant General Surgeon, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University
Nadya Y. Ahmed Assistant Professor of Histopathology ,College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University,
Star S. Hussein Senior House officer in general surgery ,Rizgary Teaching Hospital Erbil .

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2009.013

Keywords:

modified Alvarado scoring system, acute appendicitis, Appendicectomy

Abstract

Background and objective: Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. The patients with equivocal signs can present a diagnostic challenge. Early diagnosis and intervention is mandatory for prevention of complications. On the other hand negative appendicectomy should be avoided as much as possible. The aim is to evaluate the role of the modified Alvarado scoring system in early diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Methods: During a period of 6 months from 1st February to 31st July 2008; 250 patients with right iliac fossa pain were admitted and observed in Emergency Hospital in Erbil. The age of the patients was ranged between 13-70 years (mean 22 years ). The male to female ratio was 3:2. They were prospectively evaluated on admission using modified Alvarado scoring system to determine whether or not they had acute appendicitis. The results were correlated with the operative and histopathological findings.

Results: After first scoring; 179 (72%) patients were admitted and 71 (28%) patients were discharged. Rescoring by modified Alvarado scoring system was done after 6 hours from admission, only 162 (91%) patients were operated on , and the rest 17 (9%) patients were discharged. During operation we found that 142 cases (87.5%) had really acute appendicitis. Overall the modified Alvarado scoring system showed sensitivity of (93%) for [8-9] scores and (39%) for [1-7] scores. .

Conclusion: The modified Alvarado scoring system is accurate in early diagnosis of acute appendicitis . Patients with 8-9 scores should be operated on immediately without hesitation. Patients with score 5-7 must be admitted and scored frequently. Score 1-4 can be discharged unless otherwise indicated.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Fitz R.H. Perforating inflammation of the veriform appendix: with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1886;92: 321-346

Kim MK, Strait RT, Sato TT, Hennes HM. A randomized clinical trial of analgesia in children with acute abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9(4):281-7.

Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986;158(2):355-60.

Sivit CJ, Dudgeon DL, Applegate KE, et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: helical CT. Radiology 2000; 216(2):430-3.

Anonymous. A sound approach to the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (editorial). Lancet 1987;1:198-200

Orr RK, Porter Eyvazzadeh AD, et al. MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 2006;238(3):891-9.

Tzanakis NE, Efstathiou SP, Danulidis K, et al. A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Surg. 2005;29(9):1151-1157.

Lin HF, Wu JM, Tseng LM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10(6):906-10.

Owen T.D., Williams H., Stiff G., Jenkinson L.R., Rees B.I. Evaluation of the Alvarado score in acute appendicitis. J R Soc Med 1992;85: 87-88

Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15: 557-564

Arnbjörnnsson E. Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis: the value of prospective versus retrospective studies. Ann Chir Gynecol 1985;74:159-166

Teicher I., Landa B., Cohen M., Kabnick L.S., Wise L. Scoring system to aid in diagnosis of appendicitis. Ann Surg 1983;198: 753-759

Fenyö G. Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults. Acta Chir Scand 1987;153: 545-551

Kalan M., Rich A.J., Talbot D., and Cunliffe W.J. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R. Coll. Surg. Eng 1994;l76:418-419

Clarke P.J., Hands L.J., Gough M.H., Kettlewell M.G.W. the use of laparoscopy in the management of right iliac fossa pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1986;68: 68-69

Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, et al. Role of leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. Am Surg. 2005;71(4):344-7.

Rypins EB, Evans DG, Hinrichs W, et al. Tc-99m-HMPAO white blood cell scan for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal clinical presentation. Ann Surg. 1997;226(1):58-65.

Gronroos JM, Gronroos P. Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1999;86(4):501-4.

Gurleyik E, Gurleyik G, Unalmiser S. Accuracy of serum C-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon''s clinical impression. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(12):1270-4.

Albu E, Miller BM, Choi Y, et al. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(1):49-51.

Eriksson S, Granstrom L, Olander B et al. Sensitivity of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein concentrations in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg. 1995;161(1):41-5.

Skaane P, Amland PF, Nordshus T, et al. Ultrasonography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Br J Radiol. 1990; 63(754):787-93.

Sivit CJ, Newman KD, Boenning DA, et al. Appendicitis: usefulness of US in diagnosis in a pediatric population. Radiology. 1992;185(2):549-52.

Schulte B, Beyer D, Kaiser C, et al. Ultrasonography in suspected acute appendicitis in childhood-report of 1285 cases. Eur J Ultrasound 1998;8(3):177-82.

Rice HE, Arbesman M, Martin DJ, et al. Does early ultrasonography affect management of pediatric appendicitis? A prospective analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34(5):754-8; discussion 758-9.

Lee JH, Jeong YK, Park KB. Operator-dependent techniques for graded compression Sonography to detect the appendix and diagnose acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(1):91-7.

Pickuth D, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Spielmann RP. Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique?. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(4):315-9.

Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, et al. acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology. 1994;190(1):31-5.

Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, et al. Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging 1995;20(2):149-51.

Garcia Pena BM, Mandl KD, Kraus SJ, et al. Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children. JAMA. 19991; 282(11):1041-6.

Schwerk WB, Wichtrup B, Rothmund M, et al. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 1989;97(3):630-9.

Pearson R.H. Ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis. Br Med. J. 1988;297:309-310

Yuksekkaya R, Akgul E, Inal M, et al. [Unenhanced spiral CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis]. Tani Girisim Radyol. 2004;10(2):131-9.

Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, et al. CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(10):2096-103.

Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, et al. Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol. 2006;12(3):99-102.

Kaiser S, Finnbogason T, Jorulf HK, et al. Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced Helical CT. Radiology. 2004; 231(2):427-33..

Iwahashi N, Kitagawa Y, Mayumi T, Kohno H. Intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Surg 2005;29(1):83-7.

Harswick C, Uyenishi AA, Kordick MF, Chan SB. Clinical guidelines, computed tomography scan, and negative appendectomies: a case series. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(1):68-72.

Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR. A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surg. 2005;190(3):474-8.

Ashraf K, Ashraf O, Bari V, et al. Role of focused appendiceal computed tomography in clinically equivocal acute appendicitis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56(5):200-3.

Ege G, Akman H, Sahin A, et al. Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol. 2002;75(897):721-5.

Fuchs JR, Schlamberg JS, Shortsleeve MJ, Schuler JG. Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res. 2002;106(1):131-6.

Funaki B, Grosskreutz SR, Funaki CN. Using unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for suspected appendicitis in patients treated at a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(4):997-1001.

Hoecker CC, Billman GF. the utility of unenhanced computed tomography in appendicitis in children. J Emerg Med. 2005;28(4):415-21.

Mullins ME, Kircher MF, Ryan DP, et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children using limited helical CT and colonic contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(1):37-41.

Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology. 1999;213(2):341-6.

Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, et al. Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(8):1174-80; discussion 1180-1.

Kipper SL. The role of radiolabeled leukocyte imaging in the management of patients with acute appendicitis. Q J Nucl Med. 1999;43(1):83-92.

DeLaney AR, Raviola CA, Weber PN, et al. Improving diagnosis of appendicitis. Early autologous leukocyte scanning. Arch Surg. 1989;124(10):1146-51; discussion 1151-2.

Foley CR, Latimer RG, Rimkus DS. Detection of acute appendicitis by technetium 99 HMPAO scanning. Am Surg. 1992; 58(12):761-5.

Henneman PL, Marcus CS, Butler JA, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation by Tc-99m leukocyte scan. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17(2):111-6

Navarro DA, Weber PM, Kang IY, et al. Indium-111 leukocyte imaging in appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148(4):733-6.

Balthazar E.J., Megibow A.J., Hulnick D., Gordon R.B., Naidich D.P., Beranbaum E.R.: CT of appendicitis. AJR 1986;6:185-193

Takada T., Yasuda H., Uchiyama K., Hasegawa H., Shikata J.I.: Ultrasonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis in surgical indication. Int Surg 1986;71: 9-13

Reza F.saidi,Mitra Ghasemi,Role of Alvarado score in diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis, Surg Clin of North Am 1997;77:1355-70

Fenyo G., Lindberg G., Blind P., Enochsson L., Oberg A. Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring system. Eur J Surg 1997;163(11): 831-838

Ohmann C., Yang Q., Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal pain study group. Eur J Surg 1995;161: 273-281

Chan M Y P,Toe B.S,NG BL.The Alvarado score and acute appendicitis. Anna. Acad Med Singapore 2001;30:510-512