The early results of surgical treatment of congenital clubfoot by a modified soft tissue release

Authors

  • Omar Ameen Saeed Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
  • Mustafa Adnan Mustsfa Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2013.0051

Keywords:

club foot soft tissue release, pop

Abstract

Background and objective: Talipes Equinovarus (TEV) or Congenital Clubfoot is the most common congenital anomaly of the foot. The incidence of TEV is 1-2 per 1000 life births, about 30% of these cases is bilateral with a higher incidence in males than in females (2:1). Congenital Clubfoot is a complex deformity which has four components: Heel in equinus, hind foot in varus, mid foot in cavus, forefoot in adduction and supination. The presented study aimed to evaluate the surgical treatment outcome of congenital club foot by a modified soft tissue release (i.e. division of tendons of tibialis posterior and flexor hallucis longus).

Methods: This is a prospective study done on the Result of treatment of congenital Clubfoot by soft tissue release. Numbers of patients are thirty three patients, forty eight feet, fifteen patients (45.46%) had bilateral, and eighteen patients (54.55%) had unilateral deformities. Twenty one patients (63.64) were male and twelve patients (36.37) were female, male to female ratio was 1.75:1, their ages range between 4-35 months (mean ages in months = 15.43 months). The patients whom included in this study had no previous treatment because of delay in presentation.

Results: All patients were assessed clinically and radiologically. The result of our study was as follow: Excellent result for 28 feet (58.3%), Good result for 16 feet (33.3%), Poor result for 4 feet (8.3%). The over all result can be sub divided to two categories; a) satisfactory which involve both the excellent result and the good result (91.67%) and b) unsatisfactory result which involve only the poor result (8.33%).

Conclusion: The study revealed that the use of this surgical method is of good result and lower rate of complication.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Beatson, T. R and Pearson, J. R . A Method of Assessing Correction in Club Feet. J. Bone and Joint Surgery British. 1996, 48-B(1): 40-9.

Loch miller C, Johnston D, Scott A, Risman M, Hecht JT Genetic epidemiology study of idiopathic talipes equinovarus. Am J Med Genet. 1998;79: 90-6.

Apley AG . Apley’s system of orthopedics and fracture. Eighth edition; London: Arnold, a member of the Hodder Headline Group. 2004: 488-9.

Turco VJ . Resistant congenital club foot — one - stage posteromedial release with internal fixation. A follow-up report of a fifteen-year experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;61: 805-14.

Dimeglio A, bensahel H , Souchet p , Mazeau p , bonnet f classification of clubfood . J pediatr orthop B 1995; 4: 129-36.

H. Yamamato, Takeshi Muneta and Toshiro Ishibashi , Extensile exposure. 2nd ed. Fro Tokyo medical and dental university1994: 564 – 589.

A.J. Harrold, C.J. Walker. The use of tissue expander in club-foot surgery. A case report and review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983; 72: 574-7.

E. Ippolito, Herndon CH, Strong JM. Update on surgical treatment of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 2003; 4: 17-24.

James H .beaty. campbell’s operative orthopaedic. Vol . II . 1999; 988 – 1008

Kite J. The non-operative treatment of congenital clubfood south Med J 1984; 23: 337.

Ponseti IV treatment of congenital clubfood . J Bone joint surg Am 1992; 74 : 448-54.

Simons GW complete subtalar release in club feet part II comparison with less extensive procedures .J Bone joint surgery Am 1989; 67:1056-65 .

Downloads

Published

2013-12-01

How to Cite

Saeed, O. A., & Mustsfa, M. A. (2013). The early results of surgical treatment of congenital clubfoot by a modified soft tissue release. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences (Zanco J Med Sci), 17(3), 577–581. https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2013.0051

Issue

Section

Original Articles