The effect of two finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of two composite resins

Media A. Saeed; Intesar S. Toma; Razawa K. Saeed

doi:10.15218/zjms.2013.0037

Authors

Media A. Saeed Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
Intesar S. Toma Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
Razawa K. Saeed Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2013.0037

Keywords:

Nano composite, Hybrid composite, Finishing bur, Finishing disc

Abstract

Background and objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of two different types of composite resins.

Methods: Fourty samples of 6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth were prepared, 2 types of composite resins were used (nanocomposite and hybrid composite resin). Twenty samples of each type of material were prepared and divided into two main groups and then each main group subdivided randomly into two subgroups of 10 samples each. Ten samples of each material were submitted to finishing by finishing disc. While the other 10 samples of each material were submitted to finishing by finishing bur. Both finishing systems were used with a slow-speed hand piece in a dry field and with a light intermittent pressure for about 15 seconds for each disc and bur. After storage of the samples for 48 hours; the analysis of the surface roughness was carried out, three readings were made on each surface using a stylus tip, and the extension of each reading was 2 mm stroke.

Results: There was non significant difference between the groups except there was a significant difference between the two finishing systems when used with hybrid composite.

Conclusion: Finishing discs gave best results on nano composite and hybrid composite when compared with finishing diamond bur, with highly significant effect on nano composite.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004;29:275-9.

Ana LBM, Patricia PNS, Patricia ADS, Juliana ADB. Surface roughness and hardness of a composite resin: Influence of finishing and polishing and immersion methods. Materials Research 2010: 13(3): 409-415.

Roeder LB, Powers JM. Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds. Am J Dent 2004;17:109-12.

Dunkin RT, Chambers DW. Gingival response to class V composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;106:482-4.

Gulati GS, Hegde RS. Comparative evaluation of two polishing systems on the surface texture of an aesthetic material (nano-composite): A profilometric study. Peoples Journal of Scientific Research 2010; 3(2): 17-20.

Cigdem C, Gul O. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness of tooth colored materials. Quintessence International 2009; 40 (9): 783- 789.

Tatsuo E, Werner J, Masafumi K, Andreas U, Masashi K. Surface texture and roughness of polished nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Dental Materials Journal 2010; 29(2): 213-223.

Iulia RG, Malina N, Georgescu A, Gianina I. On the surface condition of composite resins obtained by various finishing techniques. Journal of Romanian Medical Dentistry 2010; 14(4): 265-268.

Rustu G, Feridun H, Akin C, Ozden O, Ali K. Surface roughness of new microhybrid resin-based composites. JADA 2005; 136:1107-1112.

Cunha L G, Alonso R C, Santos P H, Sinhoreti M A. Comparative study of the surface roughness of ormocer-based and 'conventional composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2003; 11(4): 348-53.

Garcia F. Wang L. D’Alpino P.de Souza J. Araújo P. de Lia Mondelli R. Evaluation of the roughness and mass loss of the flowable composites after simulated tooth brushing abrasion. Braz Oral Res 2004; 18(2): 156-61.

Berastegui E, Canalda C, Brau E, Miquel C. Surface roughness of finished composite resins. J Prosthetic Dent 1992; 68: 742-749.

Jefferies SR, Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ. Three composite finishing systems: a multisite in vitro evaluation. J Esthetic Dent 1992; 4:181-185.

Jefferies SR. the art and since of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin N Am 1998; 42:613-627.

Tate WH, DeSchepper EJ, Cody T. Quantitative analysis of six composite polishing techniques on a hybrid composite material. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4:30-32.

Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one- step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004; 29:203-211.

Shaintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara , Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater 1985; 1:225-227.

Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. Journal of Biomaterials Applications 2004; 19(2) 121-134.

Scurria MS, Powers JM. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1994; 71(2) 174-177.

Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence International 1999; 30(3) 169-173.

Pedrini D, Candido MS, Rodriques AL. Analysis of surface roughness of glass-ionomer cements and compomer. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2003; 30(7) 714-719.

Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, May KN Jr, Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Journal of Dentistry 2000; 28(5) 367- 373.

Asmussen E. Restorative resins: Hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1982: 90(6) 484-489.

Ferracane JL, Greener EH . The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1986; 20(1) 121-131.

Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994;10:325-30.

Hondrum SO, Fernandez R Jr. Contouring, finishing, and polishing class V restorative materials. Oper Dent 1997;22:30-6.

Zgünaltay G, Yazici AR, Gِrücü J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-colored restoratives. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:218-24.

Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 2000;25:534-43.

Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1996;21:53-8.

Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997;22:260-5.

Jung M. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat pressed glass ceramic. Oper Dent 2002;27:175-83.

Barghi N, Lind SD. A guide to polishing direct composite resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000; 21(2):138-144.

Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin- based composite. Am J Dent 2002; 15:193-197.

Choi MS, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing. Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16(4): 347-353.

Adela HG, Miguel AM, Jose CV, Amaya BE, Pablo FG. Composite resins. A review of the materials and clinical indications. Clinical Dentistry 2006; 11:215-220.

Tamayo W, Masahi M, Toshiki T, Hiroyasu K, Akitomo Rm Susumu A. Influence f polishing duration on surface roughness of resin composites. Journal of Oral Science 2005; 1:21-25.

Duygu S, Sinasi S, Safak k, Cagri U, Tolga K. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96:33-40.

Vera LS, Regina MP, Fabiana SN, Flavia PSN, Mario ACS, Wagner B. Effect of the polishing procedures on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Dentistry 2011; 10: 1-6.

Vera LS, Regina MP, Fabiana SN, Danielle L, Julio KU, Lornco CS. Effect of finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of a nano particle composite resin. Braz J Oral Sci 2011; 10(2): 105-108.

Kristine GBA, Karoline GBA, Igor SM, Jose FC, Claudia MCA. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17(1): 21-26.

Halim NF, Maria TF, Haline DN, Fernanda PM. Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J 2003 14(1): 1-6.

Andre FR, Marcelo G, Jose RL, Carlos TD. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin- based composites. Research Article 2002; 15: 193-197.

Ozgunaltay G, Yazici AR, Gorucu J. Effect of finishing and polishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 28:218-224.