Radiation protection evaluation from radio diagnostic departments in Erbil hospitals
Keywords:Radiation protection, Dosimeters, CT-scan, amount of radiation
AbstractBackground and objective: Radiation is used in some aspects of medicine, researches and in industries. These radiation applications are useful to society. However radiation can also have detrimental effects. It was important to establish rules and resolutions governing these uses to balance the positive against the negative effects. Dose limits have been established for groups who use radiation in their work as well as for population at large. The rules used in most countries have been worked out by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiation protective measures in different diagnostic radiological departments in Erbil hospitals. Methods: Data on the number of diagnostic procedures using x-ray examinations in five hospitals were collected. The palm RAD 907 Nuclear Radiation Meter and Contamination Monitor CoMo 170 were used to measure radiation leakage. Questionnaire was also used to elicit information from the most senior personnel of the hospital. Results: The finding showed that the facilities for safety were grossly inadequate and the dose rates of 16.4μSv/hr and 20μSv/hr were recorded at places for paramedics and technician room respectively. Dose rate in front of window of the monitor room was 113μSv/hr and in the reception was 20μSv/hr indicating higher health risk to the paramedic, visitors and personnel at the hospital. Conclusion: Radiation protection facilities in the radiological departments of Erbil hospitals are in general poor including both public & private sectors indicating high health risk to the paramedics, visitors and personnel at the hospitals
Daniel A, Seife T, Kalkidan H. Collective radiation dose from diagnostic x-ray examination in nine public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Ethiop J Health Dev 2010; 24 (2).
De González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. The Lancet 2004; 363(9406): 345-51.
Health Risks of Low Level Radiation Exposure. Indian J Nucl Med 2005; 20(2).
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication 60. Ann ICRP 1991; 21:1-3.
Newlin N. Reduction in radiation exposure: the rare earth screen. AJR 1978;130:1195-6.
Daniel P. Plain radiography with rare earth screen, comparison with calcium tungstate screen. AJR 1984; 143:1335-8.
Mallam SP, Oladipupo A, Sa’id A. Reappraisal of existing expressions for estimating Radiation output from Diagnostic X-ray machine. Nigerian Journal of physics 2004; 16: 30.
Mahogora WE, Nyanda AM. The potential for reduction of radiation doses to patients undergoing some common X-ray examination in Tanzania. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2000; 94(4):381-4.
Washington State University. Safety policies and procedures manual on radiation safety; 2000.
Hendry, Jolyon H, Simon et al. Human exposure to high natural background radiation: what can it teach us about radiation risks. J Radiol Prot 2009: 29(2A):29-42.
The University of Western Australia. Personal radiation monitoring (updated 23 May, 2003). Available from http://www.safety.uwa.edu.au/page/8744 (Accessed at 13 Jan 2010).
Okaro AO , Ohagwu CC, Njoku J. Evaluation of Personnel Radiation Monitoring in Radiodiagnostic Centres in South Eastern Nigeria. African Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2009; 2(1-2):49-53.
European Commission. European Guidance on Estimating Population Doses from Medical X-ray Procedures. J Radiat Prot 2008; 154.
Oluwafisoui PA, Olowookere CJ, Obed RI, Efunwole HO , Akinpelu JA “Environmental Survey and Quality Control Tests of X-Ray Diagnostic Facility of a Large Nigerian Hospital” International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences 2009; 1(2):157-62.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2014 Saeed Nadhim Younis, Runak Taher Ali, Sameeah Abdulrahman Rashid (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in Zanco J Med Sci is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).