Enhanced fertility after diagnostic hysterosalpingography using water-soluble contrast media
Keywords:Hysterosalpingography, Water-soluble contrast media, Pregnancy rate, Infertility
AbstractBackground and objectives: A possible therapeutic effect of diagnostic tubal patency testing has been debated in the literature for more than half a century. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of flushing the fallopian tubes with water-soluble contrast medium during hysterosalpingography on subsequent pregnancy rates and to find out diagnostic findings of hysterosalpingography in infertile patients. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 220 women. hysterosalpingography using water-soluble contrast media was done in a private clinic as part of their infertility work up from January 2012 to July 2012 in Erbil city, Kurdistan region, Iraq. The pregnancy rate was determined within six months from the procedure using water soluble contrast media and it was correlated with different hysterosalpingography findings. Results: The mean age (+SD) of the study population was 30.59 (+5) years. The clinical pregnancy rate was 23.2%. A statistically significant difference was found between the rate of pregnancy and hysterosalpingography results in which 27.2% of patients with normal hysterosalpingography and 6.8% of patients with abnormal hysterosalpingography got pregnant during six-month follow-up period after the procedure (P = 0.004). Conclusions: Flushing of the tubes with water-soluble contrast media during hysterosalpingography increases subsequent pregnancy rates in infertile patients.
Soules MR, Spadoni LR. Oil versus aqueous media for hysterosalpingography: a continuing debate based on many opinions and few facts. Fertil Steril 1982; 38:1-11.
Watson A, Vandekerckhove P, Lilford R, Vail A, Brosens I, Hughes E. A meta-analysis of the therapeutic role of oil soluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography: a surprising result? Fertil Steril 1994; 61:470-7.
Katz VL. Diagnostic procedures: Imaging, endometrial sampling, endoscopy: indications and contraindications, complications. In: Katz VL, Lentz GM, Lobo RA, Gershenson DM, eds. Comprehensive Gynecology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Mosby Elsevier; 2007.
Simpson WL, Beitia LG, Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: a re-emerging study. RadioGraphics 2006; 26(2):419-31.
Miller J, Weinberg R, Nancy L. The pattern of infertility diagnoses in women of advanced reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1999; 181(4):952-7.
Eng CW, Tang PH, Ong CL Hysterosalpingography: current applications. Singapore Med J 2007; 48(4):368-73.
Socolov D, Boian I, Boiculese L, Tamba B, Socolov R. Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 111(3):256-9.
Baramki TA. Hysterosalpingography. Fertil Steril 2005; 83(6):1595-606.
Krysiewicz S. Infertility in women: diagnostic evaluation with hysterosalpingography and other 2 imaging techniques. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159(2): 253-61.
Sutton D. Hysterosalpingography. In: Sutton D (editor). Textbook of radiology and imaging: 6th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2003. P. 1085-6.
Rasmussen F, Lindequist S, Larsen C, Justesen P. Therapeutic effects of hysterosalpingography: oil- versus water-soluble contrast media—a randomized prospective study. Radiology 1991; 179:75–8.
Verhoeve HR, Coppus SF, Steures P, Bourdrez P. The capacity of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy to predict natural conception. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(1):134-42
Spring DB, Barkan HE, Pruyn SC. Potential therapeutic effects of contrast materials in hysterosalpingography: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Kaiser Permanente Infertility Work Group. Radiology 2000; 214(1):53-7.
Barqawi R, Bani-Irshaid I. The effects of Contrast Media in Patients Undergoing Salpingography on Pregnancy Rates. JBMS 2007; 19(4)133-6.
Court KA, Dare AJ, Weston-Webb M, Hadden WE, Sim RG, Johnson NP. Establishment of lipiodol as a fertility treatment - prospective study of the complete innovative treatment data set. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 54(1):13-9.
David B. Spring, Howard E. Barkan. Enhanced Fertility After Diagnostic Hysterosalpingography May Be a Myth. AJR 2004; 183:1728.
Schankath AC, Fasching N, Urech-Ruh C, Hohl MK, Kubik-Huch RA. Hysterosalpingography in the workup of female infertility: indications, technique and diagnostic findings. Insights Imaging 2012; 3(5):475-83.
Mallarini G, Saba L. Role and application of hysterosalpingography and Fallopian tube recanalization. Minerva Ginecol 2010; 62(6):541-9.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2015 Media Ghazi Sedeq, Aryan Xalis Jawad, Shawnm Nasih Dawood (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in Zanco J Med Sci is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).