Perception of students about community medicine course in Hawler College of Medicine, Iraq

Abubakir M. Saleh

doi:10.15218/zjms.2015.0036

Authors

Abubakir M. Saleh Department of community medicine, college of medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2015.0036

Keywords:

Community Medicine, Hawler College of Medicine, student perception, Erbil

Abstract

Background and objective: Community medicine is an important discipline for medical students who are going to be future doctors and deal with different health problems. Community Medicine is taught in 3^rd, 4^th and 6^th year of study at Hawler College of Medicine. The aim of the study was to explore students' perception about this subject because it plays an important role in determining educational outcome.

Methods: This study was carried out in Hawler College of Medicine, Erbil city, Iraqi Kurdistan Region in the academic year 2013-2014. It was based on a self-administered questionnaire survey of 4^th year students. The questionnaire consisted of closed and open ended questions related to the attitude of students toward community medicine course, views on the positive and negative aspects and recommendations to improve the course. The quantitative data were analysed through using the statistical package for the social sciences (version 19), while qualitative data analysis comprised thematic analysis of open-ended questions using common coding techniques.

Results: The result of this study suggested that high percentage of the students had positive attitude toward the course. Sixty-six respondents (55.4%) mentioned that there are positive aspects in the course like research project (33.3.1%), having respectful and friendly teachers (31.8%) and participation of students in discussions in the classroom. Sixty-six respondents (55.4%) mentioned that there are negative aspects in the course like short duration of the course (27.2%) and some topics were repeated from other years. Fifty-seven respondents (47.8 %) have recommended a number of priorities for improving the quality of the course like: increasing practical sessions with more student participation (36.8%); decreasing theoretical lectures (22.8%) and the time for the research should be isolated without lectures (19.2%).

Conclusion: Community medicine course is well perceived by the students with some negative aspects. Some recommendations have been made for improving the quality of the course.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Navinan MR, Wijayaratne DR, Rajapakse S. Final year students’ perception regarding the curriculum in public health. Indian J community Med 2011; 36(4):268-74.

Dare AJ, Bullen C. Shifting perceptions and challenging the profession’s paradigms: Reflection from undergraduate week of population health. N Z Med J 2008; 121:45-50.

Hensel WA, Smith DD, Barry DR, Foreman R. Changes in medical education: the community perspective. Acad Med 1996; 71:441-6.

Gordon L. Public health is more important than health care. J Public Health Policy 1993; 14: 261-4.

Appleton DDR. What statistics should we teach medical undergraduates and graduates? Statistics in Medicine 1990; 9(9):1013-21.

Looney SW, Grady CS, Steiner RP. An update on biostatistics requirements in US medical schools. Acad Med 1998; 73(1):92-4.

Daher AM, Amin F. Assessing the perceptions of a biostatics and epidemiology module: View of Year 2 medical students from a Malaysian university. A cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ 2010; 10:34.

Ahmad F, Zehra N, Omair A, Anjum Q. Students' opinion regarding application of epidemiology, biostatistics and survey methodology courses in medical research. J Pak Med Assoc 2009; 59(5):307-10.

Dommisse J, Joubert G. Profile of research methodology and statistics training of undergraduate medical students at South African universities. SA Fam Pract 2009; 51(2):158-61.

Ercan I, Ozkaya G, Ocakoglu G, Yazici B, Sezer A, Ediz B. Determining Biostatistics Knowledge of Students and Physicians in Medical School. Inter Stat 2008; 3:1-17.

Harden RM. Developments in outcome-based education. Med Teach 2002; 24(2):117-20.

Harden RM, Crosby JR, Davis MH. An introduction to outcome-based education. Med Teach 1999; 21(1):7-14.

Hoat LN, Son NM, Wright EP. Perceptions of graduating students from eight medical schools in Vietnam on acquisition of key skills identified by teachers. BMC Med Educ 2008; 8(1):5.

Victor MN, Maria MM, Elsa CM. Perceptions on the importance of gerontological education by teachers and students of undergraduate health sciences. BMC Med Educ 2007; 7(1).

Lempp H, Seale C. The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: qualitative study of medical students' perceptions of teaching. BMJ 2004; 329(7469):770-3.

Hawler College of Medicine: Self study report. Erbil: College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University. Unpublished report, 2011.

Darko H, Ivan K, Imir L, Ana M, Ivana V, Ana V, et al. Teaching research methodology in medical schools: students' attitudes towards and knowledge about science. Med Educ 2004; 38(1):81-6.

Sahai H. Teaching biostatistics to medical students and professionals: Problems and solutions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 1999; 30(2):187-96.

Mostert P. Changing approaches and perceptions: biostatistics and its role in teaching the Stellenbosch doctor. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics (ICOTS 7): 2006; Salvador, Brazil. Aukland: IASE; 2006.

Lam YM. Teaching statistics to medical students in the New Medical School. Journal of the Hong Kong Medical Association 1986; 38(4):196-8.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Improving doctors' understanding of statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 1991; 154(2)223-67.

Segal S, Lloyd T, Houts PS, Stillman PL, Jungas RL, Greer RB. The association between students' research involvement in medical school and their postgraduate medical activities. Acad Med 1990; 65(8):530-3.