Thermal change assessment in the pulp chamber during orthodontic bonding with different light curing sources (An in vitro study)

Omar Fawzi Abduljabbar; Diyar Kh. Bakr; Sazan Sh. Saleem

doi:10.15218/zjms.2017.017

Authors

Omar Fawzi Abduljabbar Department of P.O.P, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
Diyar Kh. Bakr Department of Conservative, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
Sazan Sh. Saleem Department of P.O.P, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2017.017

Keywords:

Pulp temperature, Orthodontic bonding, Light cure, Thermal change

Abstract

Background and objective: Thermal change in pulp chamber with the use of light cured adhesives is one of the contemporary concerns for orthodontists. This study aimed to evaluate intra pulpal temperature rises during bracket bonding using three different light sources.

Methods: Sixty intact-extracted mandibular premolars were divided into three groups of twenty teeth for each. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of all the teeth with Transbond XT adhesive applying a constant force, first group light cured with halogen light, in second group light emitting diode was used, in third group plasma, arc light was used. The measurements were taken with a J-type thermocouple wire, placed in the center of the pulp chamber and connected to a data plugger.

Results: Statistical analysis showed that temperatures of pulp chamber change were influenced by a type of light source. The intra pulpal temperature changes for halogen was higher than a light emitting diode and both were higher than plasma arc. All the groups revealed a significant difference between each other.

Conclusion: Orthodontic bonding with using different light source did not exceed the critical 5.5° C temperature rise that may induce a thermal change in the pulp.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod 1996; 12:615–30.

Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends J Clin Orthod 2002; 36:553–68.

Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. The comparative bond strength of brackets cured using a pulsed xenon curing light with 2 different light-guide sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122:242–50.

Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. Rapid curing of bonding composite with a xenon plasma arc light. Am J Orhod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119:610–6.

Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Polymerization of orthodontic resin cement with light-emitting diode curing units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122:236–41.

Hannig M, Bott B. In-vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during composite resin polymerization with various light- curing sources. Dent Mater J 1997; 15:275–81.

Ramglu SI, Karamehmetoglu H, Sari T, Usumez S. Temperature rise caused in the pulp chamber under simulated intra-pulpal microcirculation with different light curing mode. Angle Ortho 2015; 85(3):381–5.

Malkoc S, Uysal T, Usmez S, Isman E, Baysal A. In-vitro assessment of temperature rise in the pulp during orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137:379–83.

Uzel A, Buyukyilmaz T, Kayalioglu M, Uzel I. Temperature rise during orthodontic bonding with various light curing units an in vitro study. Angle Ortho 2006; 76:330–4.

Weerakoon AT, Meyers IA, Symons AL, Walsh LJ. Pulpal heat changes with newly developed resin photopolymerization systems. Aust Endod J 2002; 28:108–11.

Hofmann N, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Effect of irradiation type (LED or QTH) on photo-activated composite shrinkage strain kinetics, temperature rise, and hardness. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110:471–9.

Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Correlation between depth of cure and temperature rise of a light-activated resin. Scand J Dent Res 1993; 101:176–9.

Kleverlaan CJ, de Gee AJ. Curing efficiency and heat generation of various resin composites cured with high-intensity halogen lights. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112:84–8.

Cobb DS, Dederich DN, Gardner TV. In vitro temperature change at the dentin/pulpal interface by using conventional visible light versus argon laser. Lasers Surg Med 2000; 26:386–97.

Yu D, Powell GL, Higuchi WI, Fox JL. Comparison of three lasers on dental pulp chamber temperature change. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1993; 11:119–22.

Powell GL, Anderson JR, Blankenau RJ. Laser and curing light induced in vitro pulpal temperature changes. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999; 17:3–5.

Goodis HE, White JM, Andrews J, Watanabe LG. Measurement of temperature generated by visible-light cure lamps in an in vitro model. Dent Mater 1989; 5:230–4.

Hofmann N, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Effect of irradiation type (LED or QTH) on photo-activated composite shrinkage strain kinetics, temperature rise, and hardness. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110:471–9.

Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. Rapid curing of bonding composite with a xenon plasma arc light. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119:610–6.

Kodonas K, Gogos C, Tziafa C. Effect of simulated pulpal microcirculation on intra-chamber temperature changes following application of various curing units on tooth surface. J Dent 2009; 37:485–90.

Weerakoon AT, Meyers IA, Symons AL, Walsh LJ. Pulpal heat changes with newly developed resin photopolymerization systems. Aust Endod J 2002; 28:108–11.

Sheridan JJ, Brawley G, Hastings J. Electrothermal de- bracketing. Part II. An in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 89:141–5.

Ozturk B, Ozturk AN, Usumez A, Usumez S, Ozer F. Temperature rise during adhesive and resin composite polymerization with various light curing sources. Oper Dent 2004; 29:325–32.

Attrill DC, Davies RM, King TA, Dickinson MR, Blinkhorn AS. Thermal effects of the Er:YAG laser on a simulated dental pulp: a quantitative evaluation of the effects of a water spray. J Dent 2004; 32:35–40.

Baysal A, Uysal T, Usumez S. Temperature rise in the pulp chamber during different stripping procedures. Angle Orthod 2007; 77:478–82.

Uysal T, Eldeniz AU, Usumez S, Usumez A. Thermal changes in the pulp chamber during different adhesive cleanup procedures. Angle Orthod 2005; 75:220–5.

Read MJ. The bonding of orthodontic attachments using a visible light cured adhesive. Br J Orthod 1984; 11:16–20.

Tarle Z, Meniga A, Knezevic A, Sutalo J, Ristic M, Pichler G. Composite conversion and temperature rise using a conventional, plasma arc and experimental blue LED curing unit. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:662–7.

Usumez A, Ozturk N. Temperature increase during resin cement polymerization under a ceramic restoration: effect of type of curing unit. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:200–4.

Ozturk B, Ozturk AN, Usumez A, Usumez S, Ozer F. Temperature rise during adhesive and resin composite polymerization with various light curing sources. Oper Dent 2004; 29:325–32.

Rajesh Ebenezar AV, Anilkumar R, Indira R, Ramachandran S, Srinivasan MR. Comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: an in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13:132–5.