Perceptions of medical students undergoing cadaveric training

  • Maaroof Tahseen Hassan Kurdistan board for medical specialties, Erbil, Iraq.
Keywords: Perceptions, Medical Students, Socio-cognitive, Cadaveric Training, Dissection

Abstract

Background and objective: Anatomy education is a principal subject within international medical and scientific curricula. Evidence based literature suggests that cadaver dissection is highly effective in establishing and retaining anatomy concepts. This study aimed to examine the perceptions of medical students about socio-cognitive aspects of dissection of human body in the Department of Anatomy at the College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil. More specifically, the study tried to find out perceptions and level of satisfaction of medical students with engagement factors that improve positive satisfaction in learning. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study that included 169 first year medical students in the College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to the medical students during their practical anatomy sessions in the Department of Anatomy. Results: More than half of the students (55%) felt normal on their first exposure to dissection. Almost around half of the students (48.6%) had increased value for fellow humans following cadaveric training. More than 95% of them thought that improvement is needed in the cadaveric training. About 40% of the respondents had a good adaptation to cadaveric training. Conclusion: The traditional dissection laboratory must remain the center for teaching and learning anatomy. It is necessary to examine the curriculum and the mode of teaching. Factors that improve positive perceptions and in learning, like helpful environment and adequate dissection instructors should be thoroughly engaged in the training of our future doctors.

References

Bergman EM, Prince KJ, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. How much anatomy is enough? Anat Sci Ed 2008; 1(4):184-8.

Darda DM. Observations by a university anatomy teacher and a suggestion for curricular change: integrative anatomy for undergraduates. Anat Sci Ed 2010; 3(2):73-6.

Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Ed 2010; 3(2):83-93.

Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89(2):104-7.

Warner JH, Rizzolo LJ. Anatomical instruction and training for professionalism from the 19th to the 21st centuries. Clin Anat. [Online] 2006 [Cited 2014 Feb 2]; 19(5):403-14. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Egwu OA, Ugwu AC, Eteudo AN, Ewunonu EO, Njoku CO. Perceptions of medical students undergoing cadaveric training: a socio-cognitive perspective. Internet Journal of Medical Update [Online] 2008 Jul-Dec [Accessed 2014 Feb 3]; 3(2):8-12. Available from: http://www.akspublication.com

Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first and second year students. Surg Radiol Anat 2007; 29(2):173-80.

Leemp HK. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Med Educ 2005; 39(3):318-25.

Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89(2):104-7.

Lufler RS, Zumwalt AC, Romney CA, Hoagland TM. Incorporating radiology into medical gross anatomy: does the use of cadaver CT scans improve students' academic performance in anatomy? Anat Sci Ed 2010; 3(2):56-63.

Petersson H, Sinkvist D, Wang C, Smedby O. Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Anat Sci Ed 2009; 2(2):61-8.

Canby CA, Bush TA. Humanities in Gross Anatomy Project: a novel humanistic learning tool at Des Moines University. Anat Sci Ed 2010; 3(2):94-6.

Böckers A, Jerg-Bretzke L, Lamp C, Brinkmann A, Traue HC, Böckers TM. The gross anatomy course: an analysis of its importance. Anat Sci Ed 2010; 3(1):3-11.

Hasan T, Ageely H, Hasan D. The role of traditional dissection in medical education. Education in Medicine Journal (EIMJ), 2010; 2 (1): e1 doi:10.5959/eimj.2.1.2010.e1 [Online] 2010 [Accessed 2014 Feb 5]. Available from: http://saifulbahri.com/ejournal/eimj/2010/EIMJ_2010_Vol_2.pdf

Talarico EF. A human dissection training program at Indiana University School of Medicine-Northwest. Anat Sci Ed 2010; 3(2):77-82.

Takayanagi M, Sakai M, Ishikawa Y, Murakami K, Kimura A, Kakuta S, et al. [Formaldehyde concentrations in the breathing zone of medical students during gross anatomy laboratory in Toho University]. Kaibogaku Zasshi 2007; 82(2):45-51.

Uchiyama I. Toxicity of formaldehyde exposure and the details of its control measures. 2010; 85(1):29-34.

VaniNI. Safety and ethical issues of bare hand cadaver dissection by medical students. Indian J Med Ethics 2010; 7(2):124-5.

Stimec BV, Draskic M, Fasel JH. Cadaver procurement for anatomy teaching: legislative challenges in a transition-related environment. Med Sci Law 2010; 50(1):45-9.

Granger NA. Dissection laboratory is vital to medical gross anatomy education. Anat Rec 2004; 281:6-8.

Evans DJ, Watt DJ. Provision of anatomical teaching in a new British medical school: getting the right mix. Anat Rec 2005; 284(1):22-7.

Hildebrandt S. Capital punishment and anatomy: history and ethics of an ongoing association. Clin Anat 2008; 21(1):5-14.

Ang ET, Sugand K, Hartman M, Seow CS, Bay BH, Abrahams P. Singapore’s anatomical future: quo vadis? Anat Sci Ed 2012; 5(4):234-40.

Trelease RB, Nieder GL, Dørup J, Schacht Hansen M. Going virtual with QuickTime VR: new methods and standardized tools for interactive dynamic visualization of anatomical structures. Anat Rec 2000; 261:64-77.

Published
2016-04-10
How to Cite
Hassan, M. (2016). Perceptions of medical students undergoing cadaveric training. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences (Zanco J Med Sci), 20(1), 1160_1166. https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2016.0004
Section
Original Articles