Cell blocks histopathology versus FNA cytology in diagnosis of primary malignant lung mass: A comparative study


  • Tenya T. Abdulhameed Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
  • Jawhar T. Omer Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
  • Salah A. Ali Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq




Cell block, Fine needle aspiration, Lung mass


Background and objective: Fine needle aspiration cytology with cell block preparation is widely used for preoperative confirmation of solitary lung mass and classification of the histologic types. This study aimed to highlight the importance of cell-block preparation in the diagnosis of primary malignant lung lesion by comparing cytomorphological preservation on paired cell block and conventional fine needle aspiration samples. 

Methods: During January 2012 to October 2015, a total of 100 cases with solitary lung mass were included, either visited Rizgary Teaching Hospital or Walfare private hospital. All the patients had undergone fine needle aspiration and cell block preparation under a CT-guide.

Results: The samples were evaluated by the fine needle aspirations and cell blocks preparations from primary lung lesion under a CT-guide. 74% were male, and the majority of them were in the sixth and seventh decade. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histologic type consisting 42% of the studied cases, followed by adenocarconima (31%), small cell carcinoma (19%) and the remaining 8% were large cell carcinomas. In the assessment of agreement of cellularity between the two methods of sample preparation, cell block served better than fine needle aspiration (P = 0.715). However, this difference was statistically non-significant. A significant relation was found for morphology which was preserved in fine needle aspiration samples better than that in cell block samples (P <0.05). In contrast, all cell block samples displayed a statistically highly significant architectural preservation compared to fine needle aspiration samples (P <0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the present study were 98.46%, 99.2% respectively.  

Conclusion: Direct fine needle aspiration smears and cell blocks complement each other, and our results indicate that both are needed in the diagnostic work-up of patients with a primary malignant lung mass.


Metrics Loading ...


Brandman S, Ko JP. Pulmonary nodule detection, characterization, and management with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging 2011; 26(2):90–105.

Kumar V, Abbas AK, FaustoN, Aster JC. Neoplasia. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic basis of disease.8th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2010. p. 220.

Mondal SK, Nag D, Das R, Mandal PK, Biswas PK and Osta M. Computed tomogram guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of lung mass with histological correlation: A study in Eastern India. South Asian J Cancer 2013; 2(1):14–8.

Miller RT, Kubier P. Immunohistochemistry on cytologic specimens and previously stained slides (When no paraffin block is available). J Histotechnol 2002; 25:251–7.

Varsegi GM, Shidham V. Cell block preparation from cytology specimen with predominance of individually scattered cells. J Vis Exp 2009; 29:1316.

Bhatia P, Dey P, Uppal R, Shifa R, Srinivasan R, Nijhawan R. Cell blocks from scraping of cytology smear: comparison with conventional cell block. Acta Cytol 2008; 52:329–33.

Akalin A, Lu D, Woda B, Moss L, Fischer A. Rapid cell blocks improve accuracy of breast FNAs beyond that provided by conventional cell blocks regardless of immediate adequacy evaluation. Diagn Cytopathol 2008; 36:523–9.

Saha A, Kumar K, Choudhuri MK. Computed tomography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of thoracic mass lesions: A study of 57 cases. J Cytol 2009; 26(2):55–9.

Tan KB, Thamboo TP, Wang SC. Audit of transthoracic fine needle aspiration of the lung: Cytological sub classification of bronchogenic carcinomas and diagnosis of tuberculosis. Singapore Med J 2002; 43:570–5.

Bandyopadhyay A, Laha R, Das TK. CT guided fine needle aspiration cytology of thoracic mass lesions: A prospective study of immediate cytological evaluation. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2007; 50:51–5.

Madan MB. Evaluation of FNAC in lung diseases. Turk J Pathol 2010; 26:1–6.

Shah S, Shukla K, Patel P. Role of needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of lung tumors. A study of 100 cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2007; 50:56–8.

Basnet SB, Thapa GB, Shahi R. Computed tomography guided percutaneous transthoracic fine needle aspiration cytology in chest masses. J Nepal Med Assoc 2008; 47:123–7.

Syed A, Shabab M, Uddin A. Computed tomography guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung lesions: A study of 162 cases. J Chittagong Med Coll Teach Assoc 2009; 20:50–2.

Khan SH, Omar T, Michelow P. Effectiveness of the cell block technique in diagnostic cytopathology. Cytol 2012; 29(3):177–182.

Thapar M, Mishra RK, Sharma A. Critical analysis of cell block versus smear examination in effusions. J Cytol 2009; 26(2):60–4.

Khouri NF, Stitik FP, Erozan YS. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of benign and malignant lung lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 144: 281–8.

Hamper UM, Khouri NF, Stitik FP. Pulmonary Hamartoma: Diagnosis of transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 1985; 155:15–8.

Rangaswamy M, Zacharia TT, Krishnamurthy J. Study of computed tomography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of thoracic lesions. J Cytol 2012; 29(1):30–4.

Jaya Shankar E, Pavani B, Chandra E. Computed tomography guided percutaneous thoracic: Fine needle aspiration cytology in lung and mediastinum. J Cytol Histol 2010; 107:1–3.

Mullan CP, Kelly BE, Ellis PK. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration of lung nodules: Effect on outcome of using coaxial technique and immediate cytological evaluation. Ulster Med J 2004; 73:32–6.




How to Cite

Abdulhameed, T. T., Omer, J. T., & Ali, S. A. (2017). Cell blocks histopathology versus FNA cytology in diagnosis of primary malignant lung mass: A comparative study. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences (Zanco J Med Sci), 21(1), 1601–1607. https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2017.009



Original Articles